Constructive vs Symbolic Calculus

A Standard Calculus text book, like Calculus: A Complete Course by Adams and Essex, is filled with symbolic formulas covering more than 1000 small print pages and is difficult for the student to digest and heavy to carry along.

The objective of a Standard Calculus text book appears to be to convince the student of the usefulness of Calculus through mass demonstration by presenting so many specific problems, which can be solved with pen and paper using Symbolic Calculus, that there can be only a few left which cannot be solved this way. In short, the objective is to show that Symbolic Calculus works by presenting very many specific examples. But the massiveness is misleading since in fact very few problems can be solved symbolically with pen and paper.

The essence of the BodyandSoul approach as Constructive Calculus is the opposite: Instead of many specific problems solved by symbolic mathematics with pen and paper, one general problem containing all the specific problems of Standard Calculus and many more, is considered. The essence of the theory is then to show how and why any given instance of the general problem can be solved by the computer, as expressed in a Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

The one general problem of Constructive Calculus, in one variable to start with, is the Initial Value Problem (IVP): Construct a function u(t) of time t such that

  • \frac{du}{dt} = f for t > 0 with u(0)=u_0,         (*)

where  f=f(u,t) is a given function of u and t and  u_0 a given initial value and du/dt the derivative of u with respect to time t , by successive time stepping according to

  • u(t+d t) = u(t) + f(u(t),t)dt with u(0)=u_0,

with dt  a small time step as an expression of du = fdt or du/dt=f.

If f (u,t) depends only on t, the solution u(t) is the integral

  • \int_0^t f(s)\, ds + x_0.

If f(u,t)=u and u_0=1, the solution is u(t)=exp(t).

 More generally, with simple dependencies of u and t all elementary functions (exponential, trigonometric, Bessel, …) are constructed this way and their properties follow from the specifics of the IPV they solve.Calculus in one variable can thus be reduced to a study of the IVP (*).

 Similarly, Calculus in several variables can essentially be reduced to an IVP of a generalization of (*) with u=u(t,x) and x a multi-dimensional space coordinate and f depending on partial derivatives of u with respect to space coordinates, which is solved by time stepping after finite element discretization in space.

 Constructive Calculus can thus be summarized as \frac{du}{dt} = f solved by time stepping du=fdt. Constructive Calculus combines simplicity with generality, which is a prime goal of (computer) science and mathematics, to be compared with the difficulty of all the specific cases of Symbolic Calculus.

We may summarize as follows:

  • Constructive Caculus is simple and general.
  • Symbolic Calculus is difficult and specia

There is a lot of confusion surrounding symbolic mathematics, as expressed by eg Herman Weyl:

  • The question of the ultimate foundations and the ultimate meaning of mathematics remains open; we do not know in what direction it will find its final solution or whether a final objective answer may be expected at all. “Mathematizing” may well be a creative activity of man, like language or music, of primary originality, whose historical decisions defy complete objective rationalization.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s